🔗 Share this article

Authorities have called it as one of the largest frauds of its type in the United Kingdom.

Altogether 14 individuals have been convicted for their role in a multi-million pound scheme to defraud in excess of 3,500 holiday ownership holders.

The affected individuals were desperate to get out of long-standing timeshare contracts and sought out support.

A large number were aged between 60 and 80. Over 500 of them lost more than £10,000, and one handed over in excess of £80,000.

Those affected were faced intense consultations continuing for six hours. They were left out of pocket, owning useless fake "points" and still bound by high-priced vacation property deals they often use.

The Business Behind the Fraud

The business at the heart of the scheme was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They collected clients' cash to finance the proprietors' luxurious lifestyle of exclusive education, high-end properties and private jets.

The leader at the helm of the organization, Mark Rowe, was sentenced to a seven and a half year jail time in January for conspiracy to defraud.

On Friday, his spouse Nicola was among the last group to hear their sentences.

She received a two-year long suspended jail sentence at Southwark Crown Court after admitting illegal fund handling.

This has been a extended wait and marks a huge win for the victims who came forward, the police and the Crown.

The Way the Inquiry Began

I first heard about SMT was in the mid-2016. I was working in the investigations unit of a media outlet, producing current affairs features.

A colleague mentioned that his parent had taken over the rights of a timeshare apartment in the Spanish coast and, after years of holidays, had begun looking to get out of the deal.

It's worth mentioning how widespread timeshares had evolved with British holidaymakers in the 1980s and 1990s.

Timeshares permitted individuals to access the same accommodation annually, or swap their time slots with additional holders who had units in different locations. Approximately 600,000 sun-lovers accepted that chance.

The early surge was paired with a many stories about unscrupulous sellers mis-selling investments. They appeared frequently on public interest shows.

The common holiday ownership agreement locked buyers for many years.

In that period, those investors who had used their assigned property in the sunshine for a long time were ageing, and many were hoping to end their association to their timeshares.

A number had declining mobility and were unable to visit their apartments. Some just thought they'd enjoyed sufficient use from them. And others had deceased, in many cases passing on their loved ones to take over the contracts - along with their regular contributions and upkeep costs.

The Undercover Operation Unfolds

This was the situation the family member had found herself. She looked online for options and came across the company, a business whose online presence claimed to release her from her deal.

Yet, having submitted funds and arranged an appointment with them, her family smelled a rat.

Subsequent checking revealed numerous individuals claiming they had paid money and received no benefit in return. In fact, they had lost money. Substantial amounts.

The investigative unit started looking into what was occurring. It was rapidly apparent that there were dubious individuals operating in the vacation property industry.

One lawyer had numerous client reports waiting to sue the company.

The team interviewed people who had engaged the company and they collectively described identical situations. They thought the firm would acquire their investment off them but when they went to a consultation (for which they submitted funds initially) they were informed there was no re-sale value.

Instead, they were encouraged - indeed compelled - to spend more money acquiring "the firm's incentive scheme", associated with the business's umbrella group, Monster Travel.

What exactly these were was somewhat vague. They sounded like a form of credit, giving access to discount travel and services and retail offers.

And they were seemingly "tradable" with fellow investors, some time down the line.

Investing money up front now would produce an eventual payoff that would cover SMT's fees and leave the investor ahead financially, released finally from their burdensome deal.

An unrealistic promise? Well, yes.

A 'Misleading Scheme'

Assuming these reports were accurate, this was a major deception.

It's what is called a "misleading sales."

Someone - specifically the organization - "baits" the client by advertising a particular product but then to state it cannot be provided, steering the customer in the direction of an alternative, lesser offering.

This is against the law. Possessing all the testimony we had collected, we argued to covertly record one of the company's meetings.

The process requires dedication, work, and clear arguments for why this is the exclusive approach to obtain the information needed to confirm deceptive practices.

Armed with that permission, our limited crew arranged a appointment with one of the organization's staff in Stratford-Upon-Avon.

Pretending to be a potential client hoping to help his mother released from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement